| USGCRP
Home |
| Search |
|
PDF version of this section of the report PDF version of the full report The hardcopy version of this report is available free of charge from the GCRIO Online Catalog
|
Developing Decision Support Resources
|
The Role of Decision SupportPrepare scientific syntheses and assessments to support informed discussion of climate variability and change and associated issues by decisionmakers, stakeholders, the media, and the general public. Develop resources to support adaptive management and planning for responding to climate variability and climate change, and transition these resources from research to operational application. Develop and evaluate methods (scenario evaluations, integrated analyses, and alternative analytical approaches) to support climate change policymaking and demonstrate these methods with case studies. See Strategic Plan for the U.S. Climate Change Science Program, Chapter 11, for detailed discussion of decision support resources development. |
Expected outcomes from the CCSP Decision Support Resources activities include:
Syntheses and Assessments
Assessments are an effective means for integrating and analyzing CCSP research results with other knowledge, and communicating useful insights in support of a variety of applications for decision support. Assessments also help identify knowledge gaps and thus provide valuable input to the process of focusing research.
The Global Change Research Act of 1990 directs the program to prepare periodically an assessment which:
To comply with the terms of Section 106, the CCSP will produce assessments that focus on a variety of science and policy issues important for public discussion and decisionmaking. The assessments will be composed of syntheses, reports, and integrated analyses that the CCSP will complete over the next 4 years. The subjects to be addressed are listed in Table 1.
CCSP cooperating agencies will sponsor or carry out the analyses within the “Guidelines for Producing CCSP Synthesis and Assessment Products” to ensure that resources from the entire program are best utilized. This approach will cover the full range of CCSP goals and will provide a “snapshot” of knowledge concerning the environmental and socioeconomic aspects of climate variability and change. The program has begun the process of developing the first of these reports on climate science findings.
The CCSP agencies and scientists funded by these agencies also will continue to participate in the principal international scientific assessments, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment reports and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO)/United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) assessments of stratospheric ozone depletion and associated environmental impacts. CCSP research programs and CCSP-supported scientists provide scientific and technical leadership in coordinating, authoring, and reviewing international assessment reports. The CCSP coordinates the U.S. Government’s scientific and technical review of the products of international assessments, and in so doing, the program invites input from a wide variety of sources, both inside and outside the government.
Recent international scientific assessments include the IPCC Third Assessment Report (2001), the Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion (2002), and the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment (Scientific Report and Overview Report forthcoming 2004). The largest assessment program to date focused on the United States was the National Assessment of the Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change (Overview Report, 2000; Foundation Report, 2001, and 17 regional and sectoral reports)
The IPCC Fourth Assessment Report is currently in the early stages of preparation and is scheduled to be completed in 2007. A U.S. scientist at NOAA serves as co-chair of the IPCC Working Group I on the scientific aspects of the climate system and climate change. The CCSP provides resources to support this Working Group. CCSP participating agency representatives also have played a significant role in nominating U.S. experts for various roles as authors and reviewers for the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report.
During the next decade, the CCSP will continue to support assessment analyses. Given the broad set of policy, planning, and operational decisions that would benefit from climate and global change information, there are a wide variety of candidates for CCSP assessments. The decision support approach adopted by the CCSP builds upon the “lessons learned” from earlier USGCRP-supported assessments, as well as other sectoral, regional, national, and international assessments. The CCRI will place enhanced emphasis on the extraction of mature, peer-reviewed scientific knowledge from the core research program for use in assessment and decision support.
Adapting to climate variability and change and their potential impacts poses challenges and opportunities for management of resources, infrastructure, and the economy. The pressures of increased population densities and intensified land use, common throughout much of the United States and other nations, increase the demand for effective management of resources sensitive to climate in many regions. For example, information on short-term climate variability (i.e., weekly, monthly and seasonal forecasts) is relevant for the development of state and regional drought action plans, agricultural operations management, water resource system management, and fishery management.
CCSP decision support resource activities will play an important role in the “transition from research to operations” for major elements of the underlying research. CCSP research results, data products, forecasts, and model results are already being applied to adaptive management decision support in a limited number of regional and sectoral case studies. Elements of climate and associated ecosystem observations from satellite, ground-based, and in situ platforms are also being synthesized into useful data products for decisionmakers. Examples include a variety of maps for crop management, water quality management, and urban planning, and integrated products illustrating snowpack, precipitation, streamflow, and potential for drought conditions.
Observations and increased understanding of El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) have led to useful predictions of El Niño events at lead times of up to several months. These climate forecasts have provided information for state and local emergency preparedness organizations; water resource management plans for the western regions; agricultural planning for the U.S. Southeast; and fire management for drought-stricken regions. Decision support tools are also employed by federal agencies to serve the public in local and regional decisionmaking and include applications in the management of carbon, water, disasters, invasive species, and coastal ecosystems along with information on public health, agriculture efficiency, and energy use. All of these products have been co-developed by scientists and users after extensive dialogues.
The CCSP will play an important role in generating improved processes and products relevant to adaptive management decisionmaking. Decision support for adaptive management requires advances in basic knowledge and progress in applying scientific information within adaptive management settings. Conducting research within a decision support framework is intended to provide multiple benefits for both managers and scientists. Ideally, users of research information are served so that new options exist for minimizing negative impacts or pursuing opportunities, and researchers benefit from refinement and prioritization of research agendas through the identification of the uncertainties most relevant to decisionmaking.
Policy-related questions regarding climate change typically arise from numerous sources, for example from:
The CCSP will work in close collaboration with the Climate Change Technology Program (CCTP) to develop evaluations of relevant policy questions that incorporate up-to-date knowledge of both scientific and technology issues. The CCSP will focus on two objectives in this area: (1) developing scientific syntheses and analytical frameworks (“resources”) to support integrated evaluations, including explicit characterization of uncertainties to guide appropriate interpretation, and (2) initially conducting a limited number of case studies with evaluation of the lessons learned, to guide future analyses.
|