| USGCRP
Home |
| Search |
|
PDF version of this section of the report PDF version of the full report The hardcopy version of this report is available free of charge from the GCRIO Online Catalog
|
3. Global Water Cycle
The global water cycle plays a critical role in the functioning of the Earth system. Through complex interactions, the global water cycle integrates the physical, chemical, and biological processes that sustain ecosystems and influence climate and related global change. Inadequate understanding of the water cycle is one of the key sources of uncertainty in climate prediction. Clouds, precipitation, and water vapor produce feedbacks that alter surface and atmospheric heating and cooling rates, leading to adjustments in atmospheric circulation and precipitation patterns—processes current climate models do not adequately represent. Improved understanding of these processes will be essential to developing options for responding to the consequences of water cycle variability and change. For these reasons, water cycle research is a high-priority area for near-term activities within CCSP.
The global water cycle research element continues to pursue important, long-term priorities. For example, insights into the formation and behavior of clouds andprecipitation, including better characterizations of the phase changes of water in clouds and the phases and onset of precipitation, are emerging from field campaigns and model studies and will be promoted in continuing activities. Similarly, the predictability of regional precipitation will be assessed and better understood by ongoing diagnostic and modeling studies that identify the connections between regional- and global-scale phenomena, land-surface conditions (such as soil moisture), and rainstorms. Results from these studies show promise of leading to earlier (and more accurate) predictions, improved ability to assess hazards and risks of extremes such as floods and droughts, and more efficient water resource management. In this context, the results of advances in coupled ocean-atmosphere-land models will be important. The ultimate goal of this water cycle research is to provide a better foundation for decisions and investments by policymakers, managers, and individuals. Achieving this goal requires a program of activities that tests predictions and data products in real decisionmaking contexts, demonstrates techniques and their effectiveness to potential users, and provides tools and strategies to transfer the science from the experimental realm to operations. Implementation of the CCSP Strategic Plan’s global water cycle research strategy addresses these issues. Highlights of Recent Research
Modeling and Simulation of Cloud Processes and Cloud Systems [11, 12, 15, 18, 23]Multi-Scale Simulations of Clouds
New Shallow Cloud Convection SchemeBy comparing regional model simulations with the observations collected at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Southern Great Plains and Tropical Western Pacific sites, scientistsevaluated the overall performance of a recently developed shallowcumulus parameterization scheme under different meteorological conditions (see Figure 13). The simulations indicate that the shallow cumulus scheme can accurately simulate both marine shallow cumuli and the observed diurnal cycle of continental shallow cumuli. Sub-grid cloud properties, the resolved thermodynamic structures, and the surface energy budget are simulated well by the model. Diagnostic Simulations of Arctic Cloud SystemsScientists used measurements made as part of the ARM Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment (M-PACE) to evaluate the performance of the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM3) of the National Corporation for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), the Atmosphere Model (AM2) of NOAA’s Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, and the weather forecast model of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) in simulating Arctic cloud systems. The two climate models were evaluated under the framework developed through a joint effort between DOE’s Climate Change Prediction Program (CCPP) and the ARM program, the CCPP-ARM Parameterization Testbed, which is a diagnostic tool for evaluating climate models using weather prediction techniques. As revealed in the study, the models simulate the occurrence of clouds fairly well, but there are substantial errors in cloud microphysical properties. ARM data will be used to suggest improvements for these models (see Figure 14). New Model of Cloud Drop Distribution that Simulates Drop ClusteringCCSPscientists have developed size-dependent models of the spatial distribution of cloud drops that simulate the observed clustering of drops. Understanding of spatialdistribution and small-scale fluctuations in cloud droplets is essential for both cloud physics and atmospheric radiation. For cloud physics, the coalescence growth ofraindrops depends upon size distribution while, for radiation, the spatial distribution of cloud drops has a strong impact on cloud radiative properties. In contrast tocurrently used models that assume homogeneity and therefore a Poisson distribution of cloud drops, the new models show strong drop clustering, which increases with larger drop size. Clustering has vital consequences for rain physics, explaining how rain can form more quickly in the new models than simulations made with the former, homogenous models. The new models also help to explain why remotely sensed cloud drop size distributions are generally biased.
Improved Understanding and Modeling of Cloud Aerosol Interaction, Cloud Organization, and Radiative Properties [17] Studying Stratus, Radiation, Aerosol, and Drizzle The DOE’s ARM and Atmospheric Science Programs and the U.S. Office of Naval Research conducted a joint extensive field experiment at Pt. Reyes, California. The objectives were to Simulating Radiative Properties of Ice CloudsScientists developed a model that provides a means of predicting the radiative properties of ice clouds in terms of explicit microphysical properties, such as the parameters describing a bimodal size distribution that accounts for the smallest ice crystals and the various ice crystal shapes in the size distribution. The ice radiative properties predicted by the model code are being used in a development version of the NCAR CAM/Community Climate System Model (CCSM), and it will be a candidate for inclusion in CAM4/CCSM4. The explicit coupling between ice particle microphysical properties and radiative properties also provides a better opportunity for investigating the role of aerosol-ice nucleation processes in global climate processes. Percentage of Global Land Areas Affected by Serious Drought Increases [2]Global Palmer Drought Severity Index data and offline simulations with the NCAR land-surface model were used to study the potential drying over global land areas associated with the warming during the last several decades. This study found that the percentage of the global land area affected by serious drought more than doubled from about 15% during the 1970s to about 30% in the early 2000s. Widespread drying occurred over much of Europe and Asia, Canada, western and southern Africa, and eastern Australia. The warming-induced drying has occurred over most land areas with the largest effects in northern mid- and high latitudes. In contrast, rainfall deficits alone were the main factor behind expansion of dry soils in Africa’s Sahel and East Asia. Figure 15 illustrates these trends.
Mass Decrease in the Greenland Ice Sheet [13, 19, 21]
Interannual Variability of the Hydrologic Cycle over North America [1, 5, 6, 22]Recent research findings indicate that dominant winter modes in the hydrologic cycle are due to moisture fluxes associated with extreme precipitation events over the west coast of the United States, and are controlled by strong El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) events, such as those of 1982-1983 and 1997-1998 (El Niño) and 1989(La Niña). In the central United States, moisture transport is associated with high-precipitation events and with moisture flux variability related to the droughts of 1983 and 1988. These research results are important because they point to a moisture storage component. The results have been incorporated in a new precipitation-recycling model that includes a soil moisture storage pool. The new recycling model was used to study the variability of monthly precipitation recycling over the conterminous United States from 1979 to 2000. Specific drought or flood years do not completely account for observed variability, pointing to a storage or “memory” term response, which subsequently affects interannual precipitation variability. To explore this soil moisture control, a novel method is being developed to use energy fluxes estimated from remote-sensing platforms to show that differences in energy fluxes (which drive moisture fluxes) are related to soil moisture through deep soil layer moisture effects on surface moisture fluxes. Deep soil influences on the uptake of moisture by plant roots result in high transpiration variability and changes in the overall energy balance. This potential vegetation response to a moisture storage pool plays a crucial role in land-atmosphere interactions through water transport in the form of evapotranspiration and root uptake, and carbon transport in the form of photosynthesis and respiration. Results show explicit correlations between vegetation variability, as controlled by topography, and the ENSO and North Pacific oceanic signals. Areas of vegetation variability found to be associated with the ENSO signal are uncommon to previous studies relating precipitation and temperature to ENSO, thus indicating a novel result and pointing to the hypothesized moisture “storage” memory. The focus of the initial phase of the analysis is on the continental United States to gain insight into general, wide-ranging relationships, yet focusing on particular ecological regions with greater vegetation variability. This will give further insight into influential mechanisms linking vegetation, climate, and physiography at small scales. Changes in the Global Water/Energy Cycle Associated with Changes in the Carbon Cycle [10]
Evidence for Positive Trends in Moisture Recycling at High Northern Latitudes Leading to Vegetation Increases [3, 4]Most observational indicators of global climate change have been found directly in the temperature record or in physical and ecological processes that respond to changing temperature. Researchers used a tracer approach to examine the atmospheric branch of the hydrologic cycle by following the moisture in global rainfall back to its evaporative sources over the last 25 years. Along with the first detailed analysis and climatology of the global atmospheric water cycle, their study shows evidence of trends in recycling at high northern latitudes driven by changes in circulation as well as surface temperature. These trends are consistent with observed vegetation-related changes and most evident where the density of meteorological data influencing the atmospheric analyses is high (see Figure 17).
New Land-Surface Schemes in Climate Models that Include Photosynthesis Show Improved Climate Simulations of Water-Cycle Parameters [8]
Correspondence between Observations and Streamflow Simulations by Climate Models, and Future Streamflow Projections [ 16]CCSP scientists analyzed the long-term streamflow characteristics in an ensemble of recent climate simulations and projections by 12 different global climate models. They found encouraging correspondences between observed historical and simulated patterns of 20th-century regional streamflow variations on multi-decadal time scales. The same models project 10 to 40% increases in runoff in eastern equatorial Africa, the La Plata basin, and high-latitude America and Eurasia, and 10 to 30% decreases in southern Africa, southern Europe, the Middle East, and mid-latitude western North America by 2050 under a mid-range scenario of greenhouse gas emissions leading to an atmospheric CO2 concentration of approximately 530 ppm by the mid-21st-century. Linking the Time Scales and Amplitudes of Groundwater and Surface Water Flows to Global Climate Variations [9]
The Groundwater Connection in the Amplification of Seasonal- to Century-scale Oscillations in Closed Basins [7, 20]
Collaborative Research: Development of Informatics Infrastructure for Hydrologic Sciences [14]
Highlights of Plans for FY 2007Priorities of the CCSP global water cycle research element include continuing U.S. and global observations, field campaigns, and experiments; improvements to data integration and analysis systems; diagnostic and predictive model development; and applications to decision-support systems. A fundamental objective of the program is to ensure that observational capability is enhanced and improved, and that the data assimilation and modeling/prediction systems are more reliable and accurate at the point of application. Several promising results from recent research will be further explored with an aim to transfer this knowledge to operational applications that provide societal benefit. Concurrently, a cohesive research strategy will be implemented to improve the current deficiencies in understanding that exist regarding many aspects of the regional and global water cycle. Several scientific questions remain, ranging from warnings of natural hazards to the impact of global climate change, be it from natural or anthropogenic causes. The program outlined for FY 2007 will lead to improvements in planning, decision making, and resource management activities—a major aim of the program. However, significant unresolved research issues will require longer term efforts. To address these research and applications needs, several initiatives will be launched in FY 2007. Following are selected highlights of FY 2007 activities. Integration of Water Cycle Observations, Research, and Modeling: A Prototype Project.Following CCSP guidelines, an interagency “integrating” priority project will be implemented (contingent on funds) as the first of similar activities that are envisaged under the water cycle element over the next decade. The purpose of this project is to address significant uncertainties associated with the water cycle through a study that comprehensively addresses the water budget within a limited spatial and temporal domain. This FY 2007 prototype project will integrate information describing the state, fluxes, and variability associated with and across hydrologic regimes. To accomplish this FY 2007 near-term priority, a number of agencies are planning to contribute to DOE’s planned field campaign (CLASIC) at the ARM Southern Great Plains site. The multi-agency effort will include space-based observations, aircraft campaigns, surface and subsurface hydrologic components, isotopic measurements, CO2 fluxes, research-mode modeling, and applications to decision-support systems as a first integrated, interagency attempt to build the science and applications components required to begin to “close” the water budget within a limited area. This activity will address CCSP Goals 1, 2, 3, and 5 and Questions 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, and 5.5 of the CCSP Strategic Plan. Participation in the Convective and Orographically Induced Precipitation StudyThe ARM Mobile Facility (AMF) will participate in the international Convective and Orographically Induced Precipitation Study in the Black Forest area in summer 2007. The goal is to identify the reasons for deficiencies in the quantitative precipitation forecast and to improve the skill of mesoscale model forecasts with respect to precipitation. The primary goal of the ARM program is to improve the treatment of cloud and radiation physics in global climate models in order to improve the climate simulation capabilities of these models. These efforts have been enhanced by the addition of the AMF to study cloud and radiation processes in multiple climatic regimes. The AMF can be deployed to sites around the world for durations of 6 to 18 months. Data streams produced will be available to the atmospheric community for use in testing and improving parameterizations in global climate models. This activity will address CCSP Goals 1, 2, and 3and Questions 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3 of the CCSP Strategic Plan. The Cloud and Land Surface Interaction CampaignThe Cloud and Land Surface Interaction Campaign (CLASIC), a field campaign proposed by DOE for implementation in FY 2007, will focus on interactions between the land surface and the early cumulus life cycle, especially the stages leading from cumulus humilis to cumulus congestus. It will cover a period of 1 to 3 months and will straddle the winter wheat harvest when large changes in the land surface lead to large changes in surface albedo, latent heat flux, and sensible heat flux. By DOE’s invitation, CLASIC will be developed further as an integrated, interagency project, contingent on FY 2007 funding and on expressions of multi-agency interest (see next item). This activity will address CCSP Goals 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 and Questions 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3 of the CCSP Strategic Plan. Blueprint for an Integrated Observing Platform: Bedrock to Boundary Layer and BeyondThe Science Steering Group (SSG) for the CCSP water cycle element will develop a blueprint for a hypothetical integrated observing platform that would be capable of quantifying all aspects of the terrestrial water and energy cycle. The plan will be conceptual but with sufficient specific detail so that one or more aspects of the platform could be implemented during one or more of the integrated interagency projects that the water cycle element may carry out over the next decade of research and applications. The blueprint could also serve as a basis for deploying terrestrial hydrologic observatories, and be used for the planning of field campaigns. The conceptual plan will include observational requirements that derive from needs for improved models of the water cycle, improved water cycle process parameterization schemes, scale interactions, and improved characterization and modeling of fluxes and transports in the atmosphere, land surface (including vegetation, streams, and reservoirs), subsurface (including the water table and subterranean aquifers), and coastal zones. The inclusion of remote-sensing and in situ instruments, fixed and portable, are envisaged. Existing observing systems will form the substrate for the integrated observing platform to which innovative technological capabilities and designs will be added. The plan will make the case for the need for new and improved observational and modeling capability to address known scientific challenges facing both water cycle research and applications to the management of water resources (quantity and quality). This activity will address CCSP Goals 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 and Questions 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3 of the CCSP Strategic Plan. Integration of Space-Based Observations and Land Surface / Hydrology Data Assimilation Systems
This activity will address CCSP Goals 1, 2, and 3 and Questions 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, and 5.5 of the CCSP Strategic Plan. Advanced Ensemble Multi-Model Prediction Techniques for Surface and Subsurface Hydrologic ParametersExpanded efforts will be made to calibrate and validate research-mode ensemble (multi-model) forecasting techniques for surface and subsurface hydrologic parameters, especially at longer seasonal time scales. The objective is to transfer the improved hydrologic prediction techniques to operational applications at seasonal and interannual time scales. This activity will expand on the recently developed Advanced Hydrological Prediction Service (AHPS) of NOAA’s hydrologic forecasting system that includes new model calibration strategies, distributed modeling approaches, ensemble forecasting, data assimilation techniques, enhanced data analysis procedures, flood forecast inundation maps, hydrologic routing models, and multi-sensor precipitation estimates. Data from USGS stream flow observations and gridded multi-sensor precipitation and snow-water equivalent estimates, among other data, will also be transferred into the AHPS data assimilation system. New approaches for remotely sensing precipitation, snow, and other inputs will be integrated into the hydrologic forecast operation. AHPS is slated to be fully implemented nationwide in 2013. In parallel, CCSP researchers will participate in the further development of an international project, the Hydrological Ensemble Prediction Experiment. This project will bring the international hydrological community together with the meteorological community and demonstrate how to produce reliable hydrologic ensemble forecasts that the emergency management and water resources sectors can use with confidence to make decisions that have important consequences for the economy and for public health and safety. This activity will address CCSP Goals 1, 3, 4, and 5 and Questions 5.3, 5.4, and 5.5 of the CCSP Strategic Plan. A New Strategy for Improving Water / Energy Cycle Components in Earth / Climate System Models
This activity will address CCSP Goals 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 and Questions 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, and 5.5 of the CCSP Strategic Plan. Science Plans for the Extension of the Global Energy and Water Experiment (GEWEX)-Coordinated Enhanced Observing Period (CEOP) through 2010.
This activity will address CCSP Goals 1, 2, and 3 and Questions 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3 of the CCSP Strategic Plan. New Watershed Climate Assessment Decision-Support CapabilitiesClimate change presents a range of risks and opportunities to water managers. To minimize risk and take advantage of opportunities, tools are necessary to promote adaptive and forward-looking environmental management by decision makers at all levels. Several projects have been initiated in the area of decision support. A new climate assessment capability, the Better Assessment Science Integrating Point and Non-point Sources (BASINS) watershed modeling system, is being developed. BASINS combines data and models from agencies including EPA, USDA, and USGS in a single system. The new tool will facilitate assessment of the influence of climate variability and change—together with land-use change and other stressors—on water quantity and quality. The tool will also provide the capacity to evaluate potential adaptation strategies to increase the resilience of water systems to changes in climate. This activity will address CCSP Goals 4 and 5 and Questions 5.3, 5.4, and 5.5 of the CCSP Strategic Plan. New Tools for the Assimilation of Remote-Sensing Data into Distributed Water Quality and Sediment Transport and Erosion ModelsThe research activities of the USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS) in the area of land data assimilation systems and model analysis are focused on the efficient integration of ground-based and remote-sensing data into critical resource and conservation practice assessment models. Existing agency research projects are aimed at the sequential assimilation of surface soil moisture retrievals and vegetation indices from microwave and visible remote sensors to constrain crop growth and root-zone water balance models. Future work will expand this emphasis to include the assimilation of remote-sensing data into distributed water quality and sediment transport and erosion models. Particular emphasis will be paid to developing data assimilation and modeling capabilities to quantify benefits arising from the adoption of conservation practices within agricultural watersheds. This activity will address CCSP Goals 4 and 5 and Questions 5.4 and 5.5 of the CCSP Strategic Plan. Tools to Help Develop “Best Management Practices” to Lessen the Impacts of Climate Variability and Change
This activity will address CCSP Goals 4 and 5 and Questions 5.3, 5.4, and 5.5 of the CCSP Strategic Plan. Integration of Information on the Effects of Changing Precipitation Patterns into Infrastructure Planning Processes.Communities around the United States are investing billions of dollars on upgrading combined sewer systems to comply with new regulations for combined sewer overflows. Previous work has suggested that climate change could alter the effectiveness of existing long-term control plans. Work has been initiated with local utility managers to better integrate information on the effects of changing precipitation patterns into infrastructure planning processes using decision-support tools such as those models developed by EPA in collaboration with other agencies. This activity will address CCSP Goals 4 and 5 and Questions 5.3, 5.4, and 5.5 of the CCSP Strategic Plan. Initial Analysis and Calibration/Validation of Observations from the CloudSat and Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) Research Satellites
This activity will address CCSP Goals 1, 2, and 3 and Questions 5.1, 5.2, and 5.3 of the CCSP Strategic Plan. Combined Management of Groundwater and Surface Water Resources
This activity will address CCSP Goals 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5and Questions 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, and 5.5 of the CCSP Strategic Plan. Research on Extended Drought: Causes, Monitoring, Analysis, Prediction, and Support for Drought Information Systems.
This activity will address CCSP Goals 1, 4, and 5 and Questions 5.4 and 5.5 of the CCSP Strategic Plan. References1) Amenu, G.G., P. Kumar, and X.-Z. Liang, 2005: Interannual variability of deep-layer hydrologic memory and mechanisms of its influence on surface energy fluxes. Journal of Climate, 18, 5024-5045. 2) Dai, A., K.E. Trenberth, and T. Qian, 2004: A global dataset of Palmer Drought Severity Index for 1870-2002: Relationship with soil moisture and effects of surface warming. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 5(6), 1117-1130. 3) Dirmeyer, P.A. and K.L. Brubaker, 2006a: Global characterization of the hydrologic cycle from a quasi-isentropic back-trajectory analysis of atmospheric water vapor. Journal of Hydrometeorology (accepted). 4) Dirmeyer, P.A. and K.L. Brubaker, 2006b: Evidence for trends in the Northern Hemisphere water cycle. Geophysical Research Letters, 33, L14712, doi:10.1029/2006GL026359. 5) Dominguez, F. and P. Kumar, 2005: Dominant modes of moisture flux anomalies over North America and their relationship to extreme hydrologic events. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 6, 194-209. 6) Dominguez, F., P. Kumar, X.-Z. Liang, and M.Ting, 2006: Impact of atmospheric moisture storage on precipitation recycling. Journal of Climate, 19, 1513-1530. 7) Duffy, C., 2005: The groundwater connection: amplification of seasonal to century scale oscillations in closed basins. In: Geological Society of America Annual Meeting Abstracts with Programs, 37(7), 162. Geological Society of America, Salt Lake City, Paper No. 64-8. 8) Friend, A.D. and N.Y. Kiang, 2005: Land surface model development for the GISS GCM: Effects of improved canopy physiology on simulated climate. Journal of Climate, 18(15), 2883-2902. 9) Hanson, R.T. and M.D. Dettinger, 2005: Ground water/surface water responses to global climate simulations, Santa Clara-Calleguas Basin, Ventura, California. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 41(3), 517-536. 10) Jackson, R.B., E.G. Jobbagy, R. Avissar, S. Baidya Roy, D.J. Barret, C.W. Cook, K.A. Farley, D.C. le Maitre, B.A. McCarl, B.C. Murray, 2005: Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration. Science, 310, 1944-1947. 11) Khairoutdinov, M., D.A. Randall, and C. DeMott, 2005: Simulation of the atmospheric general circulation using a cloud-resolving model as a super-parameterization of physical processes. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 62, 2136-2154. 12) Knyazikhin, Y., A. Marshak, M. Larsen, W. Wiscombe, J. Martonchik, and R. Myneni, 2005: Small-scale drop size variability: Impact on estimation of cloud optical properties. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 62, 2555-2567. 13) Levi, B.G., 2006: Is there a slowing in the Atlantic Ocean’s overturning circulation? Physics Today, 59(4), 26-28. 14) Maidment, D.R. (ed.), 2005: CUAHSI Hydrologic Information System Status Report [PDF] . Consortium for the Advancement of Hydrologic Science, Inc., Washington, DC, USA, 214 pp. 15) Marshak, A., Y. Knyazikhin, M. Larsen, and W. Wiscombe, 2005: Small-scale drop size variability: Empirical models for drop-size-dependent clustering in clouds. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 62, 551-558. 16) Milly, P.C.D., K.A. Dunne, and A.V. Vecchio, 2005: Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate. Nature, 438, 347-350. 17) Mitchell, D.L., A.J. Baran, W.P. Arnott, and C. Schmitt, 2006: Testing and comparing the modified diffraction approximation. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences (in press). 18) Ping Z. and C. S. Bretherton, 2004: A simulation study of shallow moist convection and its impact on the atmospheric boundary layer. Monthly Weather Review, 132(10), 2391-2409. 19) Rignot, E. and P. Kanagaratnam, 2006: Changes in the velocity structure of the Greenland Ice Sheet. Science, 311, 986-990. 20) Shun, T. and C. Duffy, 1999: Low-frequency oscillations in precipitation, temperature, and runoff on a west facing mountain front: A hydrological interpretation. Water Resources Research, 35, 191-201. 21) Velicogna, I. and J. Wahr, 2005: Greenland mass balance from GRACE. Geophysical Research Letters, 32, L18505, doi:10.1029/2005GRL023955. 22) White, A.B., P. Kumar, and D. Tcheng, 2005: A data mining approach for understanding topographic control on climate-induced inter-annual vegetation variability over the United States. Remote Sensing of Environment, 98, 1-20. 23) Xie, S., S. Klein, J. Yio, A. Beljarrs, C. Long, and M. Zhang: 2005. An assessment of ECMWF analyses and model forecasts over the North Slope of Alaska using observations from the ARM Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, D05107, doi:10.1029/2005JD006509.
|
|