An Assessment Prepared by a Task Group on Behalf of the World Health Organization, the World Meteorological Organization and the United Nations Environment Programme Edited by A. J. McMichael, A. Haines, R. Slooff and S. Kovats
|
Climate
Change and Human Health The debate about global climate change is as unusual as it is controversial. Scientific arguments usually concern interpretation of evidence gathered from the present or from the past, rather than the forecasting of complex future changes. For example, when epidemiologists argue about the effect of air pollution on asthma, they do so with reference to existing empirical research results. However, forecasting the health impacts of climate change requires us to undertake scenario-based risk assessment --- that is, to apply our knowledge of environment-health relationships gained from limited past experience to future environmental changes that are uncertain and that probably far exceed the range of past variation. For example, the rate of temperature increase that the IPCC has forecast for the next century is much faster than any that has occurred in past thousands of years. The resultant uncertainties in forecasting health impacts are compounded by uncertainties concerning social, demographic and technical changes that may influence human vulnerability or adaptive capacity. This, then, is clearly not an "exact science". But the range and seriousness of the potential health impacts of climate change means that the risk assessments discussed in this volume constitute a very important scientific undertaking. A large part of the task entails considering the various indirect effects upon human health arises from climatic stresses upon the stability and productivity of ecological systems. with few exceptions, the causal relationships involved are complex and multifactorial. A premise underlying this volume, therefore, is that we must now think imaginatively, and within an ecological framework, about the longer-term implications for human health of disturbing or damaging components of the biosphere. Chapter 1 describes the historical and economic context within which the climate change issue has arisen and discusses the scale, complexity and fundamental "newness" of the problem. An up-to-date review of the science of greenhouse gas accumulation and its effects upon the climate system is given in Chapter 2. Based on anticipated future trends in greenhouse gas emissions, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate change estimates that global mean temperature will have risen by 2-3 degrees C by late next century. Chapter 2 also discusses the associated problem of stratospheric ozone depletion. Recent studies indicate that warming of the lower atmosphere may, via stratospheric cooling, exacerbate ozone depletion. The various possible impacts of climate change and stratospheric ozone depletion upon human health are examined in Chapters 3 to 8. The impacts are referred to as "direct" or "indirect". Whereas some impacts can be foreseen easily --- such as an increase in deaths due to an increase in the frequency and severity of heatwaves --- others would depend on, for example, changes in patterns of mosquito populations and regional food production and are therefore less easy to predict. Other, more diverse and diffuse public health impacts would result from population displacement and conflict following sea level rise, and disruption of local economic activity and employment. In particular, these chapters examine:
Chapters 9 and 10 address the implications of global climate change for research, monitoring and social-policy response. We must foster interdisciplinary research and techniques adapted for modeling complex processes an the reasonable handling of attendant uncertainties. Human health-related indices should be developed and incorporated into local, regional and global monitoring systems. These indices would embrace environmental signals such as weatherwatch indices, insect population densities and crop production), shifts in the ranges or densities of sensitive indicator species (such as rodents and phytoplankton) and explicit changes in human vulnerability to disease such as poorer nutritional status, UVR-induced tissue damage and altered infectious disease dynamics). The sustainability of human population health is, of course, a fundamentally important criterion of successful social and economic policy. While there can as yet be no certainty in forecasts of the future health effects of climate change, the role of science in this context must be to promote and assist adoption of precautionary policies that balance current social needs against serious, perhaps unacceptable, future risks. FIG 1.1: "Possible impacts of climate change and stratospheric ozone depletion on human health." and TABLE 1.1: "Likely relative impact on health outcomes of the components of climate change." Work on the report began in 1993 following receipt of a grant from the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Further financial resources were obtained from the government of the Netherlands and the three participating UN agencies (WHO,WMO, and UNEP, with WHO designated the coordinating agency). An international task group of experts was formed under the direction of A. J. Michael, and met three times in two years. The views expressed in the report reflect the consensus reached by this Task Group and do not necessarily reflect the the policies of the participating agencies. |
|