| USGCRP
Home |
| Search |
Updated
12 October, 2003
|
Which
World? - A Look at Three Plausible Trend-Based Scenarios of the Future USGCRP Seminar, 22 October 1998 |
|
INTRODUCTION: Ms. Sherburne (Shere)
Abbott Dr. Richard H. Moss
SPEAKER: Dr. Allen Hammond
Looking 50 years into the future, the scenarios described below are based, in part, on the analysis of persistent long-term, demographic, economic, social, environmental, and security trends on a global scale, as well as persistent long-term trends for seven major regions of the world. The analysis is based upon country-by-country data from the World Bank, the United Nations, the World Resources Institute, and other authoritative sources. It also employs scenarios to go beyond trends and explore more complex possibilities for how the future may unfold scenarios that reflect very different mindsets or world views as well as different trajectories into the future. The results of this analysis suggest that the future is contingent upon a number of critical factors. Some critical trends are positive but others suggest that the world is moving toward a troubled future; the plausible trajectories diverge sharply. Any global destiny depends on regional choices made separately in many different corners of the world. The world is already so strongly interdependent that no region's future can be fully separate from that of others. The U.S. and Canada, for example, have an enormous stake in the fate of developing regions as these regions represent future markets, potential sources of instability and new diseases, and are settings for large-scale migrations. Their cooperation is critical to managing global environmental, social, and security challenges. Although the challenges are daunting, the results of this work suggest that there are many opportunities to shape an improved world.
Three Plausible Scenarios of a Future World The scenarios derived from this analysis are:
Surprisingly, the results of this analysis suggest that China's future does not look as secure as conventional wisdom would have it. Latin America, but for one problem, might well become the richest of any developing region. Southeast Asia, despite its current problems, may still have the brightest future of any developing region. And the most dubious and difficult future goes not to sub Saharan Africa but to North Africa and the Middle East.
Dr. Allen Hammond is senior scientist and director of strategic analysis for the World Resources Institute, a non-profit, non-partisan research institute located in Washington, D.C. His responsibilities include institute-wide leadership in the use of analytical methods and information tools for policy research, direction of the Strategic Indicator Research Initiative on environmental and sustainable development indicators, development of WRI's Communications 2000 strategy, and writing and research on long-term sustainability issues. He was formerly the editor-in-chief of the World Resources Report series. Prior to joining WRI, Dr. Hammond created the Research News section of the international journal "Science" and went on to found, and serve as editor, of several national publications, including "Science News" (published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science), "Issues in Science and Technology" (published by the National Academy of Sciences), and the "Information Please Environmental Almanac" (published by Houghton Mifflin). In addition, he broadcast a daily radio program for four years (syndicated nationally by CBS), and has written or edited ten books. His most recent book is "Which World?" Scenarios for the 21st Century", published by Island Press. Dr. Hammond has won several national magazine awards and other journalist honors. Dr. Hammond has also published extensively in the scientific and policy research literature; has lectured widely; and has served as a consultant to the White House, to several U.S. federal agencies, to the United Nations, and to several private foundations. Dr. Hammond holds advanced degrees in engineering and applied mathematics from Stanford University and Harvard University.
|
|